Up next


There is no law for masks or tests or dangerous vaccines. Just refuse.

266 Views
hocuspocusfocus
658
Published on 22 Feb 2021 / In Covid 19 84 / HoloCough

You are the answer. There is no law for masks or tests or dangerous vaccines. Just refuse. Simple and it all goes away.

Show more
8 Comments sort Sort by

qpDarKqp
qpDarKqp 13 days ago

Wait so is this only applicable to Canadians coming to US? "Charter Rights"? Or is this applicable for all US citizens? I know, I know. Basically we all should be denying it, I already do. Just yet to travel via plane yet.

   1    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 11 days ago

He's in Canada. I don't know where he's coming from though.

   1    0
qpDarKqp
qpDarKqp 10 days ago

@foffwankers: Okay, thank you foff. =)

   1    0
jackellock
jackellock 13 days ago

Just say "No." and be on your way.

   2    0
watching_the_watchers
watching_the_watchers 13 days ago

yep..all it takes is to grow a set and know your rights..then watch them scuttle back under their rocks..if everyone did this..the game would be over

   4    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 13 days ago

The problem for me is when i go shopping. They have security guards that won't let me in without one. I tried but they blocked me claiming its a private store and i have no right to refuse. While shitting their pants believing that i'm infecting them with death. I'm really starting to get angry. A war here would be great for my morale. Me against all .

   0    0
Lego
Lego 13 days ago

You should already be avoiding the (((big corporations))) to begin with. I rarely shop at a big corporation. I do most of my shopping from small businesses and event though it is more expensive, its worth it in the long run. Also, try to grow your own garden and prepare things from scratch. It goes a long way.

   3    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 11 days ago

@Lego : I do , i just go to the grocery store , a small clothing store and a pharmacy. The pharmacy lets me in without a mask. Its the only 1 though. All the other pharmacies don't.

   1    0
Lego
Lego 10 days ago

@foffwankers: I like to go thrifting at small stores because you can save money on very good deals, and yard sales are also where I get most of my furniture.

   1    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 10 days ago

@Lego : Some guy just got attacked by the store staff for not wearing a mask. They even handcuffed him!! It was at a Canadian Tire store. Big business only hires big fools it seems. That's why i like my pharmacy , its privately owned. Nice people.

   0    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 10 days ago

Their tyranny does conform to their gods laws. Satan. To them its probably honorable to lie cheat and manipulate.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

Note however, you are not a "citizen", but a man. The term citizen was foisted on US men and women when the states became subordinated to the Federal District of Columbia after the civil war. If you say you are a citizen, you are contracting with them; and also if you show them ID, which will have your name written on it in all caps, so it refers not to you, but to the legal fiction they created in your name when you were born.
But well done anyway; a perfect example of how to behave in the public space.

   7    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 13 days ago

I hate that contractual law shit. I was actually thinking about it all week. How they scam us at birth. I wish there was a way i could get out of this contract. Burn my birth certificate? They have a copy. I need to burn the original government copy? If you say you "don't understand" the rights they read to you when being arrested they can't arrest you because you didn't accept to make a contract with the police? That's what i heard. I'll try it next encounter.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

@foffwankers: Because they did not offer you full disclosure at birth, then the contract, ie the "birth certificate" they scammed your parents into signing by telling them it was "a legal requirement", is fraudulent and therefore inadmissible and non-binding on you. If you go to the Common Law Court dot com, you can declare your birth there, and that is sufficient. They MUSt create "joinder" with you if they wish to impose their statute laws, regulations, mandates, or Acts of Parliament on you; and one of the ways they do this is by asking you if you are "Mr F off Wankers"; if you say that you are, then you are agreeing to be a legal fiction, as you were not Christened with the "Mr" part, and they have you in their trap and can take admiralty Law action against you - and note, the Law of the Sea which this represents is the Law of Pirates, whereas the Law of the Land, which simply requires that you "Do No Harm", is the Common Law, and as Sir Wm. Blackstone stated in the 18th century, "No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the Law of God."

   3    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

This is why a Christian is in an unassailable position when he comes up against these satanists.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

Again, note that when they ask you to wind your window down and then ask you "If you are the driver / owner of this vehicle", most people would say "Yes". But a vehicle is a legal term with a specific meaning; it is a conveyance which you are driving FOR HIRE. So if you are just with your family, taking them to the shops, your conveyance by their own definition is NOT a vehicle; and you are NOT a driver, as again, a driver is somebody who is hirinn g out his vehicle for profit; so you are not a driver, and your conveyance is not a vehicle. So when in Britaiwe deal with the DVLA, we shouldn't be in most cases, because our form of transportation is not being carried out for profit; and the ONLY thing the government can involve itself in is when you are engaged in commercial activity for profit; and again, you do not drive in "traffic", because this is a term they use for commercial flows of vehicles.

   3    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

Also note the special meanings or definitions they have for words like "MUST" - which is legally defined as "May" - so you do not have to do whatever they say you have to, it is simply a choice you have to do it or not to do it. And the word "Summons" is not a demand that you attend a court, it is defined as "Invitation" - and we all know, you do not have to respond to an invitation to do something - but just contact them and state that you thank them for their OFFER to create joinder with you, but youy are declining to do so, and have a nice day, officer. Officers incidentally are CORPORATE SERVANTS, and their job is to enforce statute law, which you do not have to obey, if you say you are a MAN under Common Law only. A POLICE CONSTABLE, contrariwise, is charged with upholding the Common Law, which enables you to do anything that is not physically harmful to another man or woman, or their property.

   3    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

@foffwankers: Agreed. NEVER say you "understand" anything they say, because this is legal code for "Stand Under", ie stand under their authority over you.

   2    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

Lewis Carroll is supposed to have been a lawyer, and to have written "Through the Looking Glass" as a veiled reference to all of these criminal and fraudulent strategies other lawyers use to enslave the ignorant and extract money from them. So Humpty Dumpty said to Alice, "When I use a word, it means EXACTLY WHAT I THINK IT MEANS, neither more nor less", so you can see the nature of "legalese" emerging in his remark. Alice thought he was stupid for not knowing the meanings of words, but she was confused, and thinking that he was referring to everyday English.

   1    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 13 days ago

ANY WORD like "owner, taxpayer, resident, person, ratepayer, driver, householder" etc etc is ALWAYS a word which is designed to get you to identify with the straw man which they created for you at birth, including your "I / D" whether bank account slip, passport, "Driver's Licence" etc etc, so NEVER agree to be defined by ANY of these documents; you are a MAN only - never a "person", which Black's Law Dictionary defines as a "Legal Fiction", ie the ONLY type of entity another legal fiction, ie the government or its servants, can legally interact with.

   3    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 13 days ago

@HereAmI: I've been trying to answer for an hour. When i click on the comment bubble symbol nothing ever happens? Yes , this legalese talk is very confusing and very nefarious. How do they even have the right to do any of this without our permission. To understand doesn't mean "to stand under" someone? That's cheating , deception and dishonorable. Do lawyers and judges of today even know and comprehend this? To warn their clients? Or do they collude with the cops and government to guarantee work? If i do tell a cop that i will not form a contract with his "gang" , what will he do? Walk away and forget the gun in my pocket or still arrest me ? So , it is legal to have anything on me. A kilo of heroin , a machine gun and a sword? As long as i don't hurt anyone?

   0    0
VaXXXaNation
VaXXXaNation 13 days ago

Create a contract for yourself applicable to any and all contracts you are, will be contracted to. State terms and conditions.

   1    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 12 days ago

It takes a minute to activate, but your comment will post if you are patient. But as to their right to do something, it is simply contract law - if you agree to what they suggest, even though it is not in your interest to do so, then they will assume a contract is in place, and will abuse you. Commercial law is not about right and wrong; that is the job of the common law court, it is about a commercial contract, which is based on supply and demand. It is not about what is deceptive or dishonourable - that is a moral issue, not a commercial issue. I'm pretty sure that most legal persons understand that what they are doing is dishonourable, but they profit enormously from the situation, and money blinds the moral sense. This has always been understood; the original Constitution of the USA required that nobody who worked for the government should be a lawyer! As the old joke goes, "Why do they keep lawyers in science labs?" "Because there are some things that even rats won't do." If you tell a government empl;oyee that you do not consent to his unlawful actions, eg by trying to arrest you because you are sitting on a seat at a time of "covid crisis", then he may walk away if he is informed. Or he may arrest you, throw you to the ground, etc, but he is then acting unlawfully by the Common Law, and has become a criminal, and a common law jury trial will demonstrate the truth of this. As you know, there is a right to bear arms in the US, so having a gun may be illegal, but it is not unlawful unless you use it to injure somebody without good cause, ie in self defence. Again, having heroin on you may be illegal according to statute law, but it is lawful, as no person has the right to tell another person what to put into their body, so unless you are forcing somebody to buy your wares and then O/D on them, then according to Common Law, you are doing nothing unlawful. Remeber, a machine gun and a sword are both legal and lawful in certain situations, eg in a war zone, so nothing is unlawful unless you use it so as to make it so. As they say, guns don't kill people, people kill people.

   2    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 12 days ago

It is important to understand the difference between the words "lawful" and "legal" - or their opposites. Lawful is a common law term, it means that you may do anything as long as you do not gratuitously harm somebody else or their property. So in fact, according to the CL, most things are lawful. Legal, however, relates to statute or parliamentary "law", it is not allowing you to do things which are perfectly lawful according to the CL, because some person somewhere has said you may not do that thing, but as God did not put any person in a superior position before Him relative to another person, then parliamentarians may NOT apply thir regulations to you - unless you agree to them, and you agree to them by entering into a contract with them, whereby you agree to wear a mask etc,because they have said you "must", and so you have agreed to their unlawful demands.

   2    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 12 days ago

And as we have already said, if they say you "must" wear a mask, according to the legal definitions as given by Black's Law Dictionary, they are actually just telling you that you "may" wear a mask if you choose to.

   2    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 11 days ago

@HereAmI: yeah , but its the store telling me. Isn't a grocery store considered public? Since they are open to the public. Thanks for all the advice , how do you know so much about this stuff? Are you a lawyer or do you work in law? Or just informed?

   0    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 11 days ago

@HereAmI: I'm also in Canada , i wonder if its the same here since we have a Queen in charge , apparently.

   0    0
foffwankers
foffwankers 11 days ago

@VaXXXaNation: and do what? , Hand them out to the police and courts? That would be a good idea , maybe carry one with me and hand it to the cop bothering me?

   0    0
VaXXXaNation
VaXXXaNation 11 days ago

@foffwankers: Exactly

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 11 days ago

@foffwankers: My dad was a Newfie, so we always know everything about everything.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 11 days ago

Life is too short for arguing the toss with every idiot you come across. But you could ask him if he would watch a 25 - minure video about these issues if you send him one, and you could then agree to have a discussion about its contents, and maybe he could then accept your absolute right not to have to do something which you never contracted to do, and no government has the right to force you to do. So the vid is embedded in this article; I watched it, and it is very good, and very easy to understand.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 11 days ago

It's exactly the same everywhere, whether people accept it or not. Everything hinges on the concept that "The earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof, the world and they that dwell therein." If you accept this position, and obviously, many people do not - eg in China - then you are half way there already, because that then becomes the underpinning for everything else. Even if you do not accept that position, it is true anyway, and God will always defend you if you put your trust in Him. You mention the Queen, and Canadian law is entirely predicated on her, and she swore an oath to defend God's Law when she was crowned - the coinage has "Fidei Defensor" written on it, ie she swears to defend the faith, and the law is a major element of that faith. Any Canadian law passed by Ottawa has to be given her "Royal Assent" before it passes into law, and even then, it only has what is called "the colour of law" until YOU agree to abide by it, because if this law is not one which God commanded Moses to uphold, ie basically the Ten Commandments, then it is unlawful if she approves another law for example which requires you to self-isolate, wear a mask, not cross borders, etc etc. God was very clear that no king or queen could add to, or subtract from, the Laws which He gave to Moses, and ONLY on that basis could the children of Israel appoint kings unto themselves. So, long story short, no sovereign can approve any parliamentary law which does not explicitly reflect God's original laws. As the renowned 18th century English codifier of the Common Law , Sir William Blackstone stated, " No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the Law of God", and last time I checked, He said nothing about masks or any of the other nonsense they are fraudulently foisting on us at the moment. These people are actually criminals, and from the Queen on down, all have forfeited their authority before God, and He is the ultimate arbiter of everything.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 11 days ago

Incidentally, about China. Right up until 500 BC, the Chinese worshipped Shang Di, at the Temple of Heaven, which is still found in Beijing. Shang Di has ALL the attributes of YHVH, and the Emperor understood that he could ONLY rule over the Empire if he conformed to the Mandate of Heaven, ie if he obeyed God's Law, and because for thousands of years he did, then the Chinese had an extremely stable empire, and the Chinese were responsible for many great inventions. It is even thought, because of their great interest in astronomy, the stars being ordained by God "from the beginning" to be a source of wisdom and "signs and seasons", then the "wise men" who "journeyed from the east" to Bethlehem because "they saw His sign in the sky" were actually Chinese. In fact, after His crucifixion, the Emperor declared a week of mourning, because as he said, "The Man from Heaven" has died. So you see, we are all much more connected than we might have thought, and my point about the earth being the Lord's applies worldwide, and in a past time, the Chinese would have understood this too, and so from the word itself, "Stood Under" the authority of the God Who created the world. There is much more about all these things on YT if you are interested.

   0    0
Show more

Up next